Difference between revisions of "Simple population model"

From Red House Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Here is an exercise for GSCE/A level/UG Geography students I developed for RIS ([https://researchersinschools.org/ Researchers in Schools])'''
+
Here is an exercise for GSCE/A level/UG Geography students I developed for RIS ([https://researchersinschools.org/ Researchers in Schools])
  
I like it because it speaks directly to students' futures.
+
It concerns something called the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_transition demographic transition].
  
The UK is overpopulated in the sense that its current [https://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/teacher_resources/webfieldtrips/ecological_balance/eco_footprint/ ecological footprint] is significantly larger than its ecological capacity. This means that its population is consuming more environmental resources than are actually available to it.
+
I like it because it speaks very directly to students' futures.
  
Are we all doomed?  Let's find out.
+
:''The UK is overpopulated in the sense that its current [https://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/teacher_resources/webfieldtrips/ecological_balance/eco_footprint/ ecological footprint] is significantly larger than its ecological capacity. This means that its population is consuming more environmental resources than are actually available to it.  Are we all doomed?  Let's find out.''
  
===Looking at the Data===
+
====Exploring the Data====
  
The UK's current population represents a high water mark, and is due to go into steep decline as its rapidly ageing population dies off leaving diminishing numbers of younger people with low birth rates in its wake.  Germany and Japan are already beginning this decline.  The US, Canada and Australia are only staving it off by mass immigration.  Much of the developing world is just one generation behind.  This is a natural transition that happens as countries "modernise".  Coupled with it is a pretty rapid reduction in environmental impact per unit of GDP production that’s been going on since the 1960's - at least in the developed world.
+
The UK's current population represents a high water mark, and is due to go into (possibly steep) decline as its rapidly ageing population dies off over the next 20-30 years leaving diminished numbers of younger people with low birth rates in its wake.  Germany and Japan are already beginning this decline.  The US, Canada and Australia have been staving it off with mass immigration.  Much of the developing world is just one or two generations behind.  This reduction in birth rate is part of a natural transition related to "modernisation".  Coupled with it has been a pretty rapid reduction in environmental impact per unit of GDP production that’s been going on since the 1960's - at least in the developed world.
  
===Model & Validation===
+
====Model & Validation====
  
Students construct a simple stepwise forecast model of the UK's population, [[GDP per capita]] and total ecological footprint on a spreadsheet starting at 1900.  In it, people are born, have babies at 30 and die when they are 80. Birth rates vary with GDP per capita, modified by the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality GINI coefficient], changing subsequent population, GDP and ecological footprint.  Immigration of people in their 20′s is included, a proportion of whom settle permanently and have children too.  All assumptions can be changed to investigate their impact and the model is validated against data from 1900 to the present.
+
Students use a spreadsheet to construct a simple stepwise forecast model of the UK's population, [[GDP per capita]] and total ecological footprint, starting at 1900 and lasting e.g. 300 years.  In it average people are born, have babies at a certain age and die at a certain age. Birth rates vary with GDP per capita modified by the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality GINI coefficient].  Birth and death change the population of subsequent timesteps, and GDP and ecological footprint respond via trends identified in data.  Immigration of people in their 20′s is included, a proportion of whom settle permanently and have children too.  All assumptions can be varied to investigate their impact and the model is validated against data from 1900 to the present.
  
===Results & Conclusions===
+
====Results & Conclusions====
  
Provided there is
+
An obvious way through seems to be
# imminent reduction in income disparity (down to current Scandinavian levels) - which boosts GDP ''and'' birth rates
+
# imminent reduction in income disparity (down to current Scandinavian levels) - to boost GDP ''and'' birth rates
# the rapid convergence on today’s environmental state-of-the-art (also Scandinavian) continues - no new inventions necessary
+
# the rapid convergence on today’s environmental state-of-the-art (also Scandinavian) continues - no new inventions necessary!
# adequate short-term immigration - to get over the hump
+
# increased short-term immigration - avoids an even bigger slump in population and a slump in GDP per capita
the model trends suggest something like this:
+
This gives trends that look like this:
  
 
[[File:Ukpop+ecofp.jpg]][[File:Ukgdppercap.jpg]]
 
[[File:Ukpop+ecofp.jpg]][[File:Ukgdppercap.jpg]]
  
So by about 2100, the UK should end up ecologically sustainable with a stable population of about 40 million pretty mobile and well off people.   
+
So by about 2100, the UK could end up roughly ecologically sustainable with a stable population of about 40 million pretty mobile, well off people.   
  
Of course, everything depends on what decisions they decide to make.
+
Of course, everything depends on what students decide to do, in both the model and in life.
  
'''=> a super-exciting time to be starting out.'''
+
[[Category:Experiments]][[Category:Science]][[Category:Humanities]]

Latest revision as of 12:43, 22 November 2018

Here is an exercise for GSCE/A level/UG Geography students I developed for RIS (Researchers in Schools)

It concerns something called the demographic transition.

I like it because it speaks very directly to students' futures.

The UK is overpopulated in the sense that its current ecological footprint is significantly larger than its ecological capacity. This means that its population is consuming more environmental resources than are actually available to it. Are we all doomed? Let's find out.

Exploring the Data

The UK's current population represents a high water mark, and is due to go into (possibly steep) decline as its rapidly ageing population dies off over the next 20-30 years leaving diminished numbers of younger people with low birth rates in its wake. Germany and Japan are already beginning this decline. The US, Canada and Australia have been staving it off with mass immigration. Much of the developing world is just one or two generations behind. This reduction in birth rate is part of a natural transition related to "modernisation". Coupled with it has been a pretty rapid reduction in environmental impact per unit of GDP production that’s been going on since the 1960's - at least in the developed world.

Model & Validation

Students use a spreadsheet to construct a simple stepwise forecast model of the UK's population, GDP per capita and total ecological footprint, starting at 1900 and lasting e.g. 300 years. In it average people are born, have babies at a certain age and die at a certain age. Birth rates vary with GDP per capita modified by the GINI coefficient. Birth and death change the population of subsequent timesteps, and GDP and ecological footprint respond via trends identified in data. Immigration of people in their 20′s is included, a proportion of whom settle permanently and have children too. All assumptions can be varied to investigate their impact and the model is validated against data from 1900 to the present.

Results & Conclusions

An obvious way through seems to be

  1. imminent reduction in income disparity (down to current Scandinavian levels) - to boost GDP and birth rates
  2. the rapid convergence on today’s environmental state-of-the-art (also Scandinavian) continues - no new inventions necessary!
  3. increased short-term immigration - avoids an even bigger slump in population and a slump in GDP per capita

This gives trends that look like this:

Ukpop+ecofp.jpgUkgdppercap.jpg

So by about 2100, the UK could end up roughly ecologically sustainable with a stable population of about 40 million pretty mobile, well off people.

Of course, everything depends on what students decide to do, in both the model and in life.

Related Pages

 GDP per capita Expats Gallery User:Gav
 Making it more useful The Noodimen of Nood Filter bubbles
 Talk:GDP per capita MediaWiki:Common.css Monitoring the school's progress
 Tacit Knowledge Knowledge Management Personal Recommendations